Compare · ComplyJet vs Scrut
ComplyJet vs Scrut Automation vs Screenata
ComplyJet and Scrut are both budget-conscious, startup-friendly GRC platforms. ComplyJet publishes low flat pricing (from $5,000/year per framework, ≤50 employees); Scrut is risk-first and highly configurable, bundling 60+ frameworks under one flat (sales-gated) fee. Both are dashboards your team drives. Screenata is the agent-first alternative: rather than a dashboard, Vera writes policies from your infrastructure and runs the program for $499/month per framework.
Side by side
ComplyJet, Scrut Automation, and Screenata, line by line.
The detail
How ComplyJet and Scrut Automation actually differ.
ComplyJet and Scrut both court budget-conscious startups, but from different angles. ComplyJet is a low-cost closed SaaS with rare price transparency, it publishes from $5,000/year per framework (about $4,000 on a three-year commitment), capped at 50 employees, audits excluded. Scrut is risk-first and highly configurable, built around custom risk formulas and workflows, and it bundles 60+ frameworks under one flat, sales-gated fee. The axis is a published, single-framework sticker price versus a configurable, multi-framework platform whose economics favor teams pursuing several standards at once.
ComplyJet wins on transparency and entry cost for one framework: a published low price with nothing to negotiate is appealing for a small team doing a single SOC 2. Scrut wins on configurability and multi-framework value, a risk-led engine you can shape plus 60+ frameworks bundled flat suits a broader or more complex program, and its support earns praise. The tradeoff is cheapest-sticker-for-one versus flexibility-and-breadth-for-many; both remain dashboards your team drives, with audits arranged separately in ComplyJet's case.
Screenata replaces the dashboard with an agent. Vera reads your infrastructure, writes policies deterministically from real config, and collects roughly 70% of evidence into cryptographically signed, timestamped artifacts an auditor can verify independently. Choose ComplyJet for the lowest published price on a single framework, Scrut for a configurable, risk-first program with many frameworks bundled, and Screenata if a 5-50 person team would rather an agent run SOC 2 or HIPAA from Slack, email, and PRs, month to month at $499/month per framework, with grounded policies and signed evidence rather than a tool to operate.
The honest version
When to pick which.
ComplyJet
Pick ComplyJet for the lowest published sticker price on one framework.
Screenata vs ComplyJetScrut Automation
Pick Scrut for a configurable, risk-first program with 60+ frameworks bundled.
Screenata vs Scrut AutomationScreenata
Pick Screenata to have the program run for you, grounded policies and signed evidence, month to month.
See the productQuestions
ComplyJet vs Scrut Automation, answered.
What's the difference between ComplyJet and Scrut?
ComplyJet is a low-cost platform with published flat pricing (from $5,000/year per framework, ≤50 employees); Scrut is a risk-first, highly configurable platform that bundles 60+ frameworks under one flat, sales-gated fee. Both are dashboards your team drives. Screenata differs from both by being agent-first: it writes policies from your infrastructure and operates the program for you at $499/month per framework.
Which is cheaper, ComplyJet or Scrut?
ComplyJet is the cheaper, more transparent option for a single framework, it publishes from $5,000/year (about $4,000 on a 3-year commitment), capped at 50 employees. Scrut doesn't publish pricing; it's sales-gated and reported around $15K/year at entry, but bundles many frameworks with no per-framework fee. Screenata is $499/month per framework, month to month.
Is ComplyJet or Scrut better for multiple frameworks?
Scrut, it bundles 60+ frameworks under one flat fee with no per-framework charge, so pursuing several standards doesn't multiply the cost. ComplyJet publishes per-framework pricing from $5,000/year each. Screenata prices per framework at $499/month, month to month.
Does ComplyJet or Scrut include the audit?
Neither includes the audit in the platform: ComplyJet excludes audits from its published price and arranges them via a network from around $3,000, while Scrut's audits are handled separately through partner firms. Screenata is auditor-neutral and prepares signed, verifiable evidence any firm can check, at $499/month per framework.
Which is better for a very small startup, ComplyJet or Scrut?
ComplyJet targets small teams directly, with published pricing capped at 50 employees and the lowest sticker on a single framework. Scrut fits teams wanting configurability and multiple frameworks. If a small team would rather have the program run for them, Screenata operates it for $499/month per framework, month to month.
Connect and see
The fastest comparison is your own systems.
Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, before you commit to ComplyJet, Scrut Automation, or anything else.