Screenata

Compare · Security + compliance platform

Screenata vs Oneleet

Oneleet is a security-first, YC-backed platform that bundles real security work, notably penetration testing, with compliance automation, positioned explicitly against "compliance theater." Screenata shares the substance-over-paperwork view but attacks it from the compliance-operations side: Vera writes grounded policies, traces claims to signed evidence, and runs the program as an agent for $499/month per framework.

All comparisons

Side by side

Screenata and Oneleet, line by line.

Dimension
Screenata
Oneleet
What it is
AI compliance operations platform
Security-first platform (pentest included)
Policy generation
Written from infrastructure scans
Templates
Policy-to-reality check
Overpromise detector flags unprovable claims
Not offered
Evidence collection
70% fully automated, 500+ checks
Automated + bundled penetration test
Claim traceability
Policy → claim → test → signed evidence
Evidence → control
Evidence integrity
RSA/ECDSA + RFC 3161 + BYOK, open spec
PDF export
Primary interface
Slack + email + CLI + PRs + web
Dashboard
Continuous monitoring
Scheduled agents (daily → annual)
Continuous checks
When a control fails
Collects evidence, drafts the fix, re-verifies
Flags a task, waits for a human
Multi-framework
SOC 2 + HIPAA share one evidence set
Multi-framework, SOC 2 mapped across
Pricing model
$499/month per framework
Custom quote — pentest bundled
Time to audit-ready
4–6 weeks
2–3 months

Where Screenata is different

Three things Oneleet doesn’t do.

( 01 / 03 )

Policies and evidence from your infrastructure

Oneleet bundles pentest and security tooling. Screenata's focus is the compliance program itself: policies written from scans, claims traced to signed evidence, and an overpromise detector on top.

( 02 / 03 )

An operating agent, not just a platform

Screenata runs scheduled agents that collect evidence, draft remediations, and re-verify, and delivers in Slack, email, the CLI, and PRs rather than a dashboard.

( 03 / 03 )

Flat, predictable pricing

$499/month per framework, versus a bundled quote that scales with the security services attached.

The operational layer

Oneleet detects. Vera does the work.

Oneleet runs a real penetration test and monitors your stack, then flags compliance gaps for a person to collect the evidence or apply the fix. Vera is the layer that does that compliance work: she collects evidence automatically, drafts the remediation, and re-verifies once it's applied.
( 01 / 03 )

Detect

Scheduled agents scan your cloud, repos, and identity provider continuously, the same signals Oneleet reads.

( 02 / 03 )

Do

Vera collects ~70% of evidence automatically across 500+ checks, chases the attestations a dashboard can't, and when she finds a gap she opens the remediation ticket and drafts the fix.

( 03 / 03 )

Verify & sign

After a human applies the change, Vera re-verifies and files a signed, traceable artifact. She escalates judgment calls rather than acting unattended, which is what keeps auditors comfortable.

Oneleet

Pentest + detect → flag → wait for a human

Screenata

Detect → collect & remediate → re-verify → sign

Oneleet, in detail

The questions people ask about Oneleet.

Oneleet pricing

What Oneleet costs

Oneleet is quote-based (every plan requires a demo), and its price includes a real penetration test rather than leaving it to a separate vendor, third-party reviews note the bundled pentest can save $5–10K versus buying it standalone. Screenata is $499/month per framework and integrates the pentest report you obtain rather than performing it.

  • Pentest bundled into the offering (not a marketplace referral)
  • YC-backed (S22); popular in the YC startup ecosystem
  • Screenata: $499/month per framework, compliance-operations focus

Oneleet's security-first bet

Real security work vs paperwork

Oneleet (YC S22, founded by a pentester) bundles genuine penetration testing and security services and positions explicitly against "compliance theater." If you want security substance and a SOC 2 report from one security-first vendor, that's Oneleet. Screenata attacks the other side, the compliance program itself: grounded policies, claim-to-signed-evidence traceability, and an agent that runs the work.

The honest version

When Oneleet is the better fit.

We're not for everyone. Oneleet is a strong choice in these cases, and we'd rather you pick the right tool than the wrong one.
  • You want genuine security work (pentest, monitoring) bundled with compliance
  • You're a YC-adjacent startup that values security substance over paperwork
  • You'd rather buy pentest and SOC 2 from one security-first vendor

Screenata is built for the 5–50 person team that needs SOC 2 to close a deal, wants policies grounded in real infrastructure, and would rather operate compliance from Slack and the terminal than a dashboard. More on who we’re for.

Screenata

$499/month per framework

One plan, everything included. SOC 2 + HIPAA, all integrations, all agent operations. Cancel anytime.

Oneleet

Custom quote — pentest bundled

Typical GRC platform model: annual commitment, with additional frameworks and headcount priced on top.

Questions

Screenata vs Oneleet, answered.

Is Screenata a good Oneleet alternative?

It depends on what you're buying. Oneleet is security-first and bundles penetration testing with compliance automation. Screenata is compliance-operations-first: an AI agent that writes policies from your infrastructure, traces claims to signed evidence, and runs the program for $499/month per framework. If you want pentest bundled into one security-first vendor, Oneleet fits; if you want the compliance program run for you with verifiable evidence, Screenata does.

Does Screenata include penetration testing like Oneleet?

No. Oneleet bundles pentest as a core part of its offering. Screenata focuses on the compliance program, policies from infrastructure, signed evidence, continuous operation, and integrates the pentest report you obtain, rather than performing the pentest itself.

What can Screenata do that Oneleet can't?

Screenata writes policies from infrastructure scans, flags unprovable claims with an overpromise detector, traces every claim to a signed artifact verifiable outside the platform, and runs as an agent across Slack, email, the CLI, and PRs.

Connect and see

Compare on your own systems, not a feature grid.

Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, and we ship new capabilities every week.