Compare · Security + compliance platform
Screenata vs Oneleet
Oneleet is a security company that also does compliance: in-house penetration testing, code scanning, MDM, and a Security Program Manager who carries you through the audit with an external CPA firm. Its pitch is real security, not compliance theater, and on the security stack it is ahead of us. Screenata is the evidence layer: Vera runs 650+ native checks nightly and records the rest while your team works, timestamped and signed, at a published $5,988/year per framework, with the auditor your choice and no pentest bundled.
Side by side
Oneleet secures. Vera records.
Where Screenata is different
Three things Oneleet doesn’t do.
Evidence recorded, with provenance
Oneleet documents Type II sampling in product, which is more than most, but the population is still assembled by your team from uploads. Vera records the evidence while your team does the task, files it with a capture-time timestamp and a signed manifest, and pulls populations from the systems themselves so the auditor samples from a complete record.
Automated coverage depth
Oneleet documents about two dozen integrations plus a custom builder, and a third of them sync user lists only. Screenata runs 650+ native checks across 31 providers, re-run nightly, with a 60+ integration catalog. If your evidence lives in AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Microsoft 365, the check probably already exists.
A price you can read
Oneleet is quote-only, with third-party reports ranging from $8K to $60K a year depending on the security services included. Screenata is $5,988 a year per framework, published. You bring your own pentest; Vera ingests the report.
The operational layer
Where the evidence comes from.
Detect
Scheduled agents scan your cloud, repos, and identity provider continuously, the same signals Oneleet reads.
Do
Vera runs 650+ native checks nightly, records the evidence integrations can't reach while your team does the task, chases the attestations a dashboard can't, and when she finds a gap she opens the finding and drafts the fix.
Verify & sign
After a human applies the change, Vera re-verifies and files a signed, traceable artifact. She escalates judgment calls rather than acting unattended, which is what keeps auditors comfortable.
Oneleet
Security tooling → human-run program → guided uploads
Screenata
Detect → collect & remediate → re-verify → sign
Oneleet, in detail
The questions people ask about Oneleet.
Oneleet pricing
What Oneleet costs
Oneleet does not publish pricing and says so: the price depends on which services are in scope. Vendr's marketplace records an observed list price of $24,000 a year for the SOC 2 all-in-one package and $6,000 for a standalone compliance penetration test, and third-party reports range from $8K to $60K a year depending on the services included. Part of the spread is the security stack — in-house penetration tests, code scanning, MDM, and a Security Program Manager are real services with real cost. Screenata is $5,988 a year per framework, published, with no services bundled. You choose a pentest vendor and Vera ingests the report as evidence.
- Oneleet: quote-only, wide range, security services inside the number
- Screenata: $5,988/year per framework, published, no bundled services
- Both use external CPA firms for the audit; neither issues the opinion
Oneleet's security-first bet
Real security work vs evidence that holds up
Oneleet's documentation is mostly security tooling — pentest, code security, application security, MDM — and the compliance module has almost no dedicated pages. That is a deliberate bet: security is the product and compliance is the packaging. Screenata bets the other way: the evidence is the product. Both are honest positions. If your buyer wants to see a real pentest and a hardened stack, Oneleet delivers that. If your buyer's security team is going to read the SOC 2 report and ask how the evidence was produced, that is what Screenata is built to answer.
The honest version
When Oneleet is the better fit.
- You want penetration testing, SAST, dependency scanning, and MDM from one vendor with its own testers
- You want a human Security Program Manager carrying the program
- Security credibility with technical buyers matters more than compliance cost
Screenata is built for the 5–50 person team that needs SOC 2 to close a deal, wants policies grounded in real infrastructure, and would rather operate compliance from Slack and the terminal than a dashboard. More on who we’re for.
Screenata
$5,988/year per framework ($499/mo), published; bring your own pentest
Every module included, per framework. Published, not sales-gated. The audit is priced by the auditor you choose; we sell no audit and take no referral fee.
Oneleet
Quote. Vendr observed list: $24,000/yr all-in-one; pentest $6,000
Third-party figure, not a vendor list price. Ranges scale with frameworks and headcount; see the pricing section above for the full breakdown.
Source: Vendr marketplace: Oneleet (observed list price), fetched 2026-09-03.
Year one, all in
What year one actually costs.
Sources: Vendr marketplace pages (anonymized transaction data, fetched 2026-09-03); vendors’ own pricing pages and documentation where published; Vanta’s August 2026 screenshot figure; Drata “SOC 2 By the Numbers” 2026. Ranges scale with headcount and framework count; none is a vendor list price unless the vendor publishes one.
Questions
Screenata vs Oneleet, answered.
Is Screenata a good Oneleet alternative?
For the compliance evidence, yes; for the security stack, no. Oneleet brings its own penetration testers, code scanning, and MDM, with a Security Program Manager running the program. Screenata runs 650+ native checks nightly and records the rest of the evidence while your team works, timestamped, signed, and verifiable by the auditor you choose, for a published $5,988 a year per framework.
Does Screenata include penetration testing like Oneleet?
No. Oneleet's in-house pentest is a genuine differentiator. Screenata ingests the pentest report you obtain from any vendor and maps it to the controls it satisfies, so the finding lifecycle is tracked without bundling the service.
What can Screenata do that Oneleet can't?
Record evidence while your team does the actual work, with a capture-time timestamp and a signed manifest verifiable outside the platform; pull populations from the source systems rather than from uploads; run 650+ native checks across 31 providers nightly; and publish the price.
Connect and see
Compare on your own systems, not a feature grid.
Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, and we ship new capabilities every week.