Compare · Low-cost compliance
Screenata vs ComplyJet
ComplyJet is a low-cost, startup-scoped compliance platform, one of the few that publishes flat pricing: $5,000/year for one framework or $8,000/year for two on a 1-year plan (about 20% less on a 3-year commitment), capped at 50 employees, audits excluded. Screenata is also startup-focused and transparently priced, but the model is different: an operating agent that writes policies from infrastructure, traces claims to signed evidence, and runs the program continuously, month to month, rather than a low-cost dashboard your team drives.
Side by side
Screenata and ComplyJet, line by line.
Where Screenata is different
Three things ComplyJet doesn’t do.
An agent that operates the program
ComplyJet is a low-cost dashboard your team still drives. Screenata's agent does the collection, drafts remediations, and re-verifies, so the daily work happens without anyone opening a tab.
Policies from reality, with a proof chain
Screenata writes policies from infrastructure scans, flags unprovable claims, and traces each claim to a signed artifact verifiable outside the platform.
Month to month, no multi-year lock-in
ComplyJet's lowest rates require a 1- to 3-year commitment. Screenata is $499/month per framework, month to month, cancel anytime, with the agent and all integrations included, so you're not locked in to reach a headline price.
The operational layer
ComplyJet detects. Vera does the work.
Detect
Scheduled agents scan your cloud, repos, and identity provider continuously, the same signals ComplyJet reads.
Do
Vera collects ~70% of evidence automatically across 500+ checks, chases the attestations a dashboard can't, and when she finds a gap she opens the remediation ticket and drafts the fix.
Verify & sign
After a human applies the change, Vera re-verifies and files a signed, traceable artifact. She escalates judgment calls rather than acting unattended, which is what keeps auditors comfortable.
ComplyJet
Detect → flag → wait for a human
Screenata
Detect → collect & remediate → re-verify → sign
ComplyJet, in detail
The questions people ask about ComplyJet.
ComplyJet pricing
The published tiers, explained
ComplyJet is one of the few vendors that publishes pricing: $5,000/year for one framework and $8,000/year for two on a 1-year plan, about 20% less (roughly $4,000 and $6,400) on a 3-year commitment, capped at 50 employees, with audits arranged separately through a network from about $3,000. Screenata is $499/month per framework ($5,988/year), month to month with no multi-year commitment.
- Lowest published sticker price for a single framework
- The cheapest rate requires a 3-year commitment
- Screenata: $499/month per framework, month to month, cancel anytime
ComplyJet alternatives
Cheapest sticker vs done-for-you
ComplyJet's edge is transparent, low pricing and no sales gauntlet, and for a first single-framework certification on a tight budget, that's a real advantage. It's still a low-cost dashboard your team drives, with the audit sourced separately. Screenata competes on model rather than sticker price: an agent that writes policies from your infrastructure, collects signed evidence, and runs the program for you at a flat per-framework rate.
The honest version
When ComplyJet is the better fit.
- You want the lowest published price for a first single-framework certification
- You're an early startup (≤50 employees) on a tight budget
- You're comfortable driving the dashboard yourself and sourcing the audit separately
Screenata is built for the 5–50 person team that needs SOC 2 to close a deal, wants policies grounded in real infrastructure, and would rather operate compliance from Slack and the terminal than a dashboard. More on who we’re for.
Screenata
$499/month per framework, month to month
One plan, everything included. SOC 2 + HIPAA, all integrations, all agent operations. Cancel anytime.
ComplyJet
$5,000/yr one framework, $8,000/yr two (1-yr); ~20% less on 3-yr; ≤50 employees, audits excluded
Typical GRC platform model: annual commitment, with additional frameworks and headcount priced on top.
Questions
Screenata vs ComplyJet, answered.
Is Screenata a good ComplyJet alternative?
It depends on what you're optimizing for. On headline price, ComplyJet is cheaper: it publishes $5,000/year for one framework (about $4,000/year on a 3-year commitment), capped at 50 employees. Screenata is $499/month per framework ($5,988/year), so we don't try to beat them on price, we're the agent that does the work, month to month with no multi-year lock-in, writing policies from your infrastructure and producing signed, verifiable evidence. Pick ComplyJet for the lowest sticker price on one framework; pick Screenata to have the program run for you.
How much does ComplyJet cost compared to Screenata?
ComplyJet publishes $5,000/year for one framework and $8,000/year for two on a 1-year plan (about 20% less, roughly $4,000 and $6,400, on a 3-year commitment), capped at 50 employees, with audits arranged separately from about $3,000. Screenata is $499/month per framework ($5,988/year), month to month with no annual commitment. ComplyJet is cheaper on sticker price; Screenata includes the operating agent and month-to-month flexibility.
What can Screenata do that ComplyJet can't?
Screenata writes policies from infrastructure scans rather than templates, flags unprovable claims, traces every claim to a signed artifact verifiable outside the platform, and runs as an agent from Slack, email, the CLI, and PRs, rather than a dashboard your team drives.
Connect and see
Compare on your own systems, not a feature grid.
Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, and we ship new capabilities every week.