Compare · Drata vs Delve
Drata vs Delve vs Screenata
Drata is the mature GRC autopilot; Delve is the AI-native newcomer with a wide framework catalog. Both automate SOC 2, but from different generations of the category.
Side by side
Drata, Delve, and Screenata, line by line.
The detail
How Drata and Delve actually differ.
Drata and Delve represent the incumbent and the challenger in the same market. Drata is the mature GRC autopilot, customizable control mapping, tailored workflows, a Trust Center, and an established ecosystem your team drives. Delve is the AI-native entrant, launched out of Y Combinator's Winter 2024 batch, that leans on AI for onboarding and evidence and carries an unusually wide framework catalog, including AI-governance standards like ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act. The axis between them is proven configurability and maturity versus AI-first speed and catalog breadth, two generations of the same SOC 2 automation category. In March 2026 an anonymous post accused Delve of producing fabricated evidence and routing customers through audit firms that rubber-stamped reports; Delve denies the allegations, and Y Combinator removed it from its directory in April 2026.
Drata wins for teams that want a tunable, battle-tested platform: its autopilot bends to custom control language, and its maturity reassures auditors and enterprise buyers. Delve wins for teams drawn to AI-native onboarding and the widest framework list, particularly startups needing emerging AI-governance coverage that older tools are slower to ship. The genuine tradeoff is stability versus frontier: Drata is the more established, more configurable option, while Delve trades some track record for a faster, model-driven experience and broader, newer framework support.
Screenata is AI-native too, so against Delve the real difference is the specific model, not the presence of AI. Vera derives policies deterministically from your infrastructure, flags overpromises your systems can't back, and links every claim to a cryptographically signed, timestamped artifact any auditor can verify outside the tool.
The honest version
When to pick which.
Screenata
Pick Screenata for AI that operates the program and produces verifiable, signed evidence.
See the productQuestions
Drata vs Delve, answered.
What's the difference between Drata and Delve?
Drata is a mature, template-first GRC dashboard with an autopilot; Delve is AI-native with a broad framework catalog including AI-governance standards.
Is Delve or Drata more established?
Drata is the more established platform, with a mature, customizable autopilot and a broad ecosystem of auditors and integrations. Delve is a newer AI-native entrant, and since March 2026 it has faced allegations about its evidence and audit arrangements, which it denies.
Which is better for AI-governance frameworks, Drata or Delve?
Delve, its catalog explicitly includes AI-governance standards like ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF, which suits teams shipping AI products. Drata centers on established frameworks such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Screenata focuses on SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001.
Is Delve a YC-backed company?
Delve went through Y Combinator's Winter 2024 batch, but Y Combinator removed it from its directory in April 2026, after a March 2026 anonymous post accused Delve of fabricated evidence and rubber-stamp audit firms. Delve denies the allegations. Drata is the larger, more mature platform.
Can I switch from Drata to an AI-native platform?
Yes, but changing platforms means reconnecting integrations and rebuilding evidence, usually timed to renewal since Drata is an annual contract. Screenata is AI-native and takes your policies as PDF or DOCX, mapped to tests. Evidence from your current observation window stays in your Drata export.
Connect and see
The fastest comparison is your own systems.
Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, before you commit to Drata, Delve, or anything else.