Screenata

Compare · GRC + audit platform

Screenata vs Thoropass

Thoropass (formerly Laika) is unusual among GRC platforms: it runs an in-house, AICPA-registered CPA firm, so the software, the readiness work, and the audit itself can come from one vendor. Screenata is agent-first and audit-firm-neutral: Vera writes the policies from your infrastructure, collects signed evidence, and prepares an audit-ready package your auditor of choice can verify, for $499/month per framework.

All comparisons

Side by side

Screenata and Thoropass, line by line.

Dimension
Screenata
Thoropass
What it is
AI compliance operations platform
GRC platform + in-house auditor (CPA firm)
Policy generation
Written from infrastructure scans
Templates
Policy-to-reality check
Overpromise detector flags unprovable claims
Not offered
Evidence collection
70% fully automated, 500+ checks
Semi-automated
Claim traceability
Policy → claim → test → signed evidence
Evidence → control
Evidence integrity
RSA/ECDSA + RFC 3161 + BYOK, open spec
PDF export
Primary interface
Slack + email + CLI + PRs + web
Dashboard
Continuous monitoring
Scheduled agents (daily → annual)
Continuous checks
When a control fails
Collects evidence, drafts the fix, re-verifies
Flags a task, waits for a human
Multi-framework
SOC 2 + HIPAA share one evidence set
Multi-framework incl. SOC 1 & HITRUST
Pricing model
$499/month per framework
Custom quote — audit bundled
Time to audit-ready
4–6 weeks
2–3 months

Where Screenata is different

Three things Thoropass doesn’t do.

( 01 / 03 )

Auditor-neutral, signed evidence

Thoropass bundles its own audit firm. Screenata prepares evidence any auditor can verify outside the platform, cryptographically signed, so you're never locked to one firm's process.

( 02 / 03 )

An agent that does the work

Thoropass is an audit-lifecycle dashboard your team works through. Screenata's agent collects the evidence, drafts remediations, and re-verifies on a schedule across Slack, email, and the CLI.

( 03 / 03 )

Policies from infrastructure, flat pricing

Screenata writes policies from your real stack and runs SOC 2 for $499/month per framework (HIPAA priced separately), versus a bundled quote that scales with audit scope.

The operational layer

Thoropass detects. Vera does the work.

Thoropass monitors your stack and flags what the bundled audit needs, then waits for a person to collect the evidence before its in-house auditors review it. Vera does the collection and drafting herself, re-verifies once a fix is applied, and files evidence any auditor can check, not just Thoropass's.
( 01 / 03 )

Detect

Scheduled agents scan your cloud, repos, and identity provider continuously, the same signals Thoropass reads.

( 02 / 03 )

Do

Vera collects ~70% of evidence automatically across 500+ checks, chases the attestations a dashboard can't, and when she finds a gap she opens the remediation ticket and drafts the fix.

( 03 / 03 )

Verify & sign

After a human applies the change, Vera re-verifies and files a signed, traceable artifact. She escalates judgment calls rather than acting unattended, which is what keeps auditors comfortable.

Thoropass

Detect → flag → wait → in-house audit

Screenata

Detect → collect & remediate → re-verify → sign

Thoropass, in detail

The questions people ask about Thoropass.

Thoropass pricing

What Thoropass costs

Thoropass is quote-based, and because it runs its own in-house CPA firm, the audit is bundled into the price rather than a separate line item, third-party estimates put a typical bundle around $30K/year. Screenata is $499/month per framework and auditor-neutral, so the audit stays a separate engagement with the firm of your choice.

  • Platform + audit in one bill (in-house CPA firm)
  • Covers SOC 1/2, ISO, PCI, HIPAA, HITRUST
  • Screenata: $499/month per framework; you pick and pay your auditor

Thoropass & auditor lock-in

One vendor, one auditor

Thoropass's convenience is buying the platform and the audit together through its own AICPA-registered firm. The flip side is that you use their firm, timeline, and methodology, and switching later can mean leaving historical data behind. Screenata is auditor-neutral: it prepares signed, externally-verifiable evidence any registered CPA firm can check, so you keep free choice of auditor.

The honest version

When Thoropass is the better fit.

We're not for everyone. Thoropass is a strong choice in these cases, and we'd rather you pick the right tool than the wrong one.
  • You want a single vendor to handle both the platform and the actual audit
  • You'd rather not source a separate CPA firm
  • You need SOC 1 or HITRUST alongside SOC 2

Screenata is built for the 5–50 person team that needs SOC 2 to close a deal, wants policies grounded in real infrastructure, and would rather operate compliance from Slack and the terminal than a dashboard. More on who we’re for.

Screenata

$499/month per framework

One plan, everything included. SOC 2 + HIPAA, all integrations, all agent operations. Cancel anytime.

Thoropass

Custom quote — audit bundled

Typical GRC platform model: annual commitment, with additional frameworks and headcount priced on top.

Questions

Screenata vs Thoropass, answered.

Is Screenata a good Thoropass alternative?

For teams that want to pick their own auditor, yes. Thoropass bundles compliance software with its own in-house CPA firm, so platform and audit come from one vendor. Screenata is an AI agent that writes policies from your infrastructure and prepares signed, auditor-neutral evidence for $499/month per framework. If you want a single-vendor bundle, Thoropass fits; if you want the work done for you and freedom to choose your auditor, Screenata does.

Does Screenata include the audit like Thoropass?

No, and that's deliberate. Thoropass runs an in-house CPA firm and bundles the audit. Screenata is auditor-neutral: it prepares a signed, audit-ready evidence package any registered CPA firm can verify outside the platform, so you're free to choose your auditor.

What can Screenata do that Thoropass can't?

Screenata writes policies from infrastructure scans, flags unprovable claims, traces every claim to a signed artifact, and runs the program as an agent from Slack, email, and the CLI, rather than as an audit-lifecycle dashboard your team drives.

Connect and see

Compare on your own systems, not a feature grid.

Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, and we ship new capabilities every week.