Compare · Vanta vs Secureframe
Vanta vs Secureframe vs Screenata
Vanta and Secureframe are both established GRC platforms with broad framework coverage. Vanta leans on the largest integration catalog and market presence; Secureframe differentiates with a bench of in-house compliance experts and a dedicated CMMC/defense line. Both are dashboards your team drives on an annual contract. Screenata is the agent-first alternative: it does the work rather than guiding you through it, for $499/month per framework.
Side by side
Vanta, Secureframe, and Screenata, line by line.
The detail
How Vanta and Secureframe actually differ.
Vanta and Secureframe sit close together on the map, both template-first GRC platforms covering SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and more, both sold on annual contracts, both driven from a dashboard. The axis that separates them is what surrounds the software. Vanta bets on scale: the largest integration catalog and the most auditors, partners, and peers who already know the product. Secureframe bets on people and specialization, former auditors on staff to guide you, plus a defense-grade CMMC line, with SSP and POA&M authoring and a managed CUI enclave, that Vanta doesn't try to match.
Vanta wins when breadth and momentum matter: more connectors close more evidence gaps automatically, and ubiquity smooths every conversation with an auditor or enterprise buyer. Secureframe wins when you want a hand on your shoulder, its in-house experts and "Comply AI" remediation help teams that don't have a compliance lead, and its SSP/POA&M/SPRS tooling and managed CUI enclave make it the real choice for defense contractors chasing CMMC. The shared limitation is that both still expect your team to operate the dashboard day to day, cycle after cycle.
Screenata takes the operation off your plate rather than adding experts beside you or connectors beneath you. Vera scans your actual infrastructure, writes policies grounded in what's really configured (an overpromise detector flags claims your systems can't back), and drives roughly 70% of evidence to cryptographically signed artifacts. Choose Vanta for the widest ecosystem, Secureframe for expert guidance and CMMC/defense depth, and Screenata if you want an agent to run SOC 2 or HIPAA end to end from Slack and the CLI for $499/month per framework, month to month and auditor-neutral.
The honest version
When to pick which.
Secureframe
Pick Secureframe for in-house expert support and deep CMMC/FedRAMP coverage.
Screenata vs SecureframeScreenata
Pick Screenata if you want the program run for you, policies from infrastructure, signed evidence, $499/month per framework.
See the productQuestions
Vanta vs Secureframe, answered.
What's the difference between Vanta and Secureframe?
Both are GRC dashboards with broad framework support. Vanta's edge is the largest integration catalog and market share; Secureframe's is a bench of in-house experts and strong CMMC/defense coverage. Neither publishes pricing. Screenata differs from both by being agent-first: it writes policies from your infrastructure and runs the program for you at $499/month per framework.
Which is better for CMMC, Vanta or Secureframe?
Secureframe has a dedicated CMMC/defense product line (SSP, POA&M, SPRS tracking, managed CUI enclave), which makes it the stronger fit for defense contractors. Vanta covers SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and more but isn't defense-specialized.
Is there an agent-first alternative to Vanta and Secureframe?
Yes, Screenata. Instead of a dashboard your team drives (with or without expert help), Vera reads your infrastructure, writes the policies, collects ~70% of evidence automatically, and runs the program from Slack and the CLI for $499/month per framework.
Does Vanta or Secureframe include compliance experts?
Secureframe bundles in-house compliance experts, many of them former auditors, to guide your program, which suits teams without a dedicated compliance lead. Vanta is more self-serve, leaning on its software, documentation, and partner network. Screenata replaces the guided-dashboard model entirely: Vera runs the program herself and escalates only what needs a human, for $499/month per framework.
Can I migrate from Vanta to Secureframe?
Yes, though switching means reconnecting integrations, re-mapping controls, and rebuilding evidence in the new platform, work usually timed to a contract renewal. Screenata avoids the re-import problem because Vera re-derives policies and evidence directly from your live infrastructure, and it's month to month rather than an annual commitment.
Connect and see
The fastest comparison is your own systems.
Connect GitHub and cloud read-only. Vera generates policies and a control matrix from your real infrastructure in minutes, before you commit to Vanta, Secureframe, or anything else.