How Screenata Unifies Evidence Across SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, and CMMC

Screenata unifies compliance evidence by using AI-powered workflow recording to capture application-level control tests once and automatically mapping the resulting evidence packs to SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and CMMC requirements. This "collect once, comply many" approach eliminates manual screenshot repetition and ensures audit-readiness across diverse regulatory standards through a single, centralized evidence repository.

Why is Unified Evidence Important for Multi-Framework Compliance?

As organizations scale, they often face "audit fatigue"—the burden of proving the same security controls to different auditors for different certifications. For example, a SaaS company might need to demonstrate logical access controls for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA simultaneously.

The Problem of Redundant Documentation

Without a unified system like Screenata, compliance teams spend 40–80 hours per framework on manual evidence collection. This leads to:

Duplicate Effort: Taking the same screenshots of a user permission screen four times for four different audits.
Inconsistent Evidence: Using a screenshot from January for SOC 2 but a screenshot from March for ISO, leading to auditor questions.
Version Control Chaos: Managing thousands of PNG and PDF files across different folders and GRC tools.
Context Gaps: Missing the specific metadata (timestamps, tester ID) required by one framework but not another.

How Screenata Maps Evidence to SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, and CMMC

Screenata functions as the "connective tissue" between your actual application workflows and the various control frameworks. It uses AI agents to understand the intent of a test and map it to the corresponding requirements in each standard.

1. The "Collect Once, Comply Many" Logic

Screenata identifies overlapping controls across frameworks. When you record a workflow—such as deprovisioning a user—the AI identifies that this single action satisfies requirements for multiple standards:

SOC 2: CC6.3 (Authorized access is removed upon termination).
ISO 27001: Annex A.9.2.6 (Removal or adjustment of access rights).
HIPAA: 164.308(a)(4) (Information Access Management).
CMMC: AC.L2-3.1.4 (Delineate duties of individuals).

2. AI-Driven Cross-Framework Mapping

Screenata’s engine uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze the captured workflow and match it against the Trust Services Criteria (SOC 2), Annex A (ISO), Security Rule (HIPAA), and NIST SP 800-171 (CMMC).

Framework	Control Hierarchy Used by Screenata
SOC 2	Trust Services Criteria (CC Series)
ISO 27001	Annex A Controls (A.5 to A.18)
HIPAA	Administrative, Physical, and Technical Safeguards
CMMC	Level 2 Practices (Access Control, Incident Response, etc.)

What Types of Cross-Framework Evidence Can Screenata Automate?

Screenata focuses on the "20% gap"—the application-level evidence that infrastructure tools like Vanta or Drata cannot reach.

Logical Access and Identity Management

Activity: Testing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).
Unified Evidence: Screenshots of "Access Denied" screens for non-admins.
Mapping: CC6.1 (SOC 2), A.9.1.1 (ISO), 164.312(a)(1) (HIPAA), AC.L2-3.1.1 (CMMC).

Change Management and DevOps

Activity: Documenting a Peer Review and Production Deploy.
Unified Evidence: Recording the GitHub PR approval and the subsequent CI/CD log.
Mapping: CC7.2 (SOC 2), A.12.1.2 (ISO), 164.308(a)(8) (HIPAA), CM.L2-3.4.1 (CMMC).

Vulnerability and Risk Management

Activity: Reviewing a vulnerability scan dashboard and remediation.
Unified Evidence: Capture of the dashboard showing "Zero Critical Vulnerabilities."
Mapping: CC8.1 (SOC 2), A.12.6.1 (ISO), 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) (HIPAA), RA.L2-3.11.2 (CMMC).

How Screenata Works: The Unified Workflow

Step 1: Record the Master Evidence

Instead of thinking about frameworks, the user focuses on the security activity. The user opens the Screenata browser extension and starts a recording of a specific security procedure (e.g., "Quarterly Access Review").

Step 2: AI Metadata Enrichment

As the user navigates the application, Screenata captures:

High-resolution, timestamped screenshots.
DOM elements (to prove the button clicked was actually "Delete User").
Network logs (to prove the backend API responded with a 200 OK).
Tester identity via SSO integration.

Step 3: Multi-Framework Tagging

The AI analyzes the recording and presents a "Mapping Suggestion" screen.

"This recording matches SOC 2 CC6.3, ISO A.9.2.2, and HIPAA 164.308."
The user confirms the mapping with one click.

Step 4: Unified Evidence Pack Generation

Screenata generates a single ZIP or PDF "Evidence Pack" that contains specialized reports for each auditor. While the screenshots are the same, the narrative and control language in the report adjust to match the specific framework's terminology.

Comparison: Manual vs. Screenata Unified Evidence

Feature	Manual Multi-Framework Process	Screenata Unified Process
Collection Time	40 hours per framework	5 minutes per control test
Mapping	Manual Excel spreadsheets	AI-automated mapping
Redundancy	High (Repeat tests for each audit)	Zero (Test once, map to all)
Auditor Trust	Variable (Depends on manual notes)	High (Immutable logs & timestamps)
GRC Sync	Manual upload to Vanta/Drata	Automated API sync
Framework Coverage	Limited by human bandwidth	Comprehensive (SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, CMMC)

Example Use Case: Access Control (CC6.1 / ISO A.9 / HIPAA 164.312)

The Scenario: A healthcare SaaS company needs to prove to auditors that only authorized medical staff can view Patient Health Information (PHI).

The Screenata Process:

Recording: A compliance officer logs in as a "Billing Clerk" and attempts to access the "Clinical Records" tab.
Capture: Screenata records the "403 Unauthorized" error page and the user profile settings.
AI Analysis: The AI recognizes this as an Access Control test.
Unified Mapping:
- SOC 2: Maps to CC6.1 (Logical access to protected information is restricted).
- HIPAA: Maps to 164.312(a)(1) (Access Control for ePHI).
- ISO 27001: Maps to A.9.4.1 (Information access restriction).
Result: One 2-minute recording provides three distinct evidence artifacts for three different auditors.

Integration with Drata, Vanta, and GRC Ecosystems

Screenata does not replace GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) platforms; it enhances them. While Drata and Vanta are excellent at monitoring infrastructure (AWS/GCP) and employee status (Okta/HRIS), they cannot "see" inside your custom application workflows.

How Screenata Unifies with GRCs:

Direct Sync: Screenata pushes the unified evidence packs directly into the "Documents" or "Evidence" tabs of Drata/Vanta.
Control Linking: Screenata uses the same Control IDs as the major GRC platforms to ensure seamless reconciliation.
Gap Filling: Screenata provides the "manual" evidence that GRC platforms typically flag as "Needs Attention."

Best Practices for Cross-Framework Evidence Collection

To maximize the value of unified evidence, compliance teams should follow these standards:

Define a "Master Control List": Identify the 15–20 core activities that overlap across SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, and CMMC.
Use Descriptive Session Names: Instead of "Test 1," name recordings "Quarterly_Deprovisioning_Review_Q4_2025."
Leverage AI Redaction: Ensure the tool automatically masks PII (Patient Health Information) or secrets during the recording to stay HIPAA compliant.
Perform "Dry Run" Audits: Use Screenata’s reporting feature to view your evidence through the lens of a specific framework before the actual auditor arrives.
Maintain Continuous Collection: Don't wait for the "audit window." Record evidence as the activities happen (e.g., during every monthly access review).

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Screenata support CMMC Level 2 specifically?

Yes. Screenata is designed to meet the rigorous documentation requirements of CMMC Level 2 (NIST SP 800-171), providing the "Computer Use" level evidence that C3PAO auditors require for practice validation.

Can I use Screenata for HIPAA if my app handles PHI?

Yes. Screenata includes automated redaction features that mask sensitive fields in screenshots. Furthermore, Screenata signs Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) with healthcare clients to ensure full HIPAA compliance.

How does Screenata handle framework updates (e.g., ISO 27001:2022)?

The Screenata AI engine is updated centrally. When a framework changes its control numbering or requirements, Screenata automatically updates its mapping logic so your existing evidence remains relevant.

Does this replace the need for an auditor?

No. Screenata is a tool for evidence generation. You still need a qualified CPA (for SOC 2) or a Certifying Body (for ISO) to review the evidence and issue the report. Screenata simply makes their job faster and your audit cheaper.

Can I export evidence if I don't use a GRC tool?

Yes. Screenata provides standalone PDF and ZIP exports that are professionally formatted and ready to be emailed or uploaded to any auditor portal.

Key Takeaways

✅ Unification: Screenata allows you to test a control once and apply it to SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, and CMMC.
✅ Efficiency: Reduces manual evidence collection time by up to 90% (from 60 minutes to 5 minutes per control).
✅ Accuracy: AI-powered mapping ensures evidence is linked to the correct framework requirements without human error.
✅ Audit-Ready: Generates professional evidence packs with timestamps, tester IDs, and step-by-step documentation.
✅ Complementary: Integrates directly with GRC platforms like Drata and Vanta to automate the "manual" 20% of compliance.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "HowTo",
  "name": "How to Unify Compliance Evidence Across Frameworks",
  "description": "A guide on using Screenata to capture evidence once and map it to SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, and CMMC.",
  "step": [
    {
      "@type": "HowToStep",
      "name": "Record Security Workflow",
      "text": "Use the Screenata browser extension to record a security procedure in your application."
    },
    {
      "@type": "HowToStep",
      "name": "AI Analysis",
      "text": "The AI identifies screenshots, metadata, and intent of the recording."
    },
    {
      "@type": "HowToStep",
      "name": "Cross-Framework Mapping",
      "text": "Map the single recording to relevant controls in SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, or CMMC."
    },
    {
      "@type": "HowToStep",
      "name": "Generate Evidence Pack",
      "text": "Export a unified report or sync it directly to your GRC platform like Drata or Vanta."
    }
  ],
  "totalTime": "PT5M"
}