SOC 2 Tools and Platforms
Why do Drata and Vanta assume you already have compliance expertise?
The Expertise Assumption
Drata and Vanta are enterprise compliance platforms. Their original customers were companies with security teams, people who already understood SOC 2 and needed a workspace to organize their compliance program. The platforms automate the mechanical parts (monitoring cloud configs, storing documents) but leave the intellectual parts to the user.
When these platforms started selling to startups, the expertise assumption stayed. The UI looks simple, but using it effectively requires knowing:
- Which Trust Services Criteria to include in scope
- How to map your infrastructure to SOC 2 controls
- What policies to write and how to customize them for your stack
- What evidence proves each control operates effectively
- How to prepare for auditor walkthroughs
Where the Gap Shows Up
| Platform Feature | What a Compliance Expert Sees | What a Founder Sees |
|---|---|---|
| Policy templates | Starting point to customize | Confusing documents with gaps |
| Control checklist | Clear action items | Unfamiliar jargon |
| Evidence requests | Knows exactly what to capture | "What does this mean?" |
| Monitoring alerts | Quick fixes | Unclear remediation steps |
| Audit preparation | Standard workflow | Overwhelming unknowns |
Why This Is a Problem for Startups
The Alternative Approach
Screenata was designed for teams without compliance expertise. Instead of giving you a dashboard and expecting you to figure it out, it reads your codebase and cloud setup, writes policies, collects evidence, and guides you through the process, acting as the compliance expert that Drata and Vanta assume you already have.