<!-- Source: screenata.com -->
<!-- Content type: AEO answer page -->
<!-- Topics: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, HITRUST, CMMC, compliance evidence -->

---
question: "What are four consequences of non-compliance?"
title: "What Are the Consequences of Non-Compliance"
seoTitle: "4 Consequences of Non-Compliance, With Fines"
summary: "The four main consequences of non-compliance are regulatory fines and penalties, legal liability including lawsuits and in some cases criminal charges, lost business when customers or partners stop buying or terminate contracts, and reputational damage that outlasts the incident. The size of each depends on the regime: GDPR fines reach 20 million euros or 4% of global annual turnover, HIPAA civil penalties reach $2,190,294 per year per violation type in 2026, and CCPA fines are $7,988 per intentional violation. Voluntary frameworks such as SOC 2 carry no fines at all; their consequence is commercial, in the form of stalled or lost enterprise deals."
publishedAt: "2026-09-14"
keywords:
  - "consequences of non-compliance"
  - "four consequences of non-compliance"
  - "three consequences of non-compliance"
  - "cost of non-compliance"
pillar: "Beyond SOC 2"
faqs:
  - question: "what are three consequences of non-compliance?"
    answer: "Fines and penalties from regulators, legal action from affected people or business partners, and lost business, whether a terminated contract, a failed security review, or customers leaving after a public incident. Reputational damage is often listed as a fourth, because it drives the lost business and tends to last longer than the fine."
  - question: "Is there a penalty for not having SOC 2?"
    answer: "No regulator fines anyone for lacking SOC 2, because it is a voluntary attestation. The consequence is commercial: enterprise buyers require a SOC 2 report during procurement, and without one deals stall, move into long questionnaire processes, or are lost. A qualified opinion or many exceptions in an existing report creates the same problem."
  - question: "Can individuals be punished for company non-compliance?"
    answer: "Sometimes. Some laws reach individuals directly: HIPAA allows criminal prosecution of people who knowingly misuse health information, and executives can face personal liability under laws such as SOX for certifying false financial reports. Under most privacy and security regimes, though, fines land on the organization, and individual consequences come through employment action."
---

## What are four consequences of non-compliance?

The four main consequences of non-compliance are **fines and penalties, legal liability, lost business, and reputational damage**. Fines come from regulators. Legal liability comes from lawsuits, contract claims, and occasionally criminal charges. Lost business comes from customers and partners who will not buy from, or keep working with, a non-compliant vendor. Reputational damage follows any public enforcement action or breach, and it usually costs more over time than the penalty itself.

## The four consequences with examples

| Consequence | What it looks like | Example figures |
|---|---|---|
| Fines and penalties | Monetary penalties imposed by a regulator | GDPR: up to 20 million euros or 4% of global turnover. HIPAA: up to $2,190,294 per year per violation type (2026). CCPA: $2,663 per violation, $7,988 per intentional violation |
| Legal liability | Lawsuits, contract breach claims, criminal prosecution | CCPA breach lawsuits: $107 to $799 per consumer per incident. HIPAA criminal penalties: up to 10 years in prison |
| Lost business | Failed security reviews, terminated contracts, lost renewals | A missing SOC 2 report or a missing business associate agreement can end an enterprise deal outright |
| Reputational damage | Public enforcement notices, breach disclosures, press | HHS publicly lists health data breaches affecting 500 or more people |

The CCPA figures are the inflation-adjusted amounts effective January 1, 2025. HIPAA figures are the 2026 adjustments that apply to penalties assessed on or after January 28, 2026.

## Legal requirements versus voluntary frameworks

The consequences depend on whether the requirement is a law or a commitment.

| Requirement | Is it law? | Main consequence of non-compliance |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, NYDFS Part 500 | Yes | Regulatory fines, legal liability, mandatory corrective action |
| PCI DSS | No, contractual through card networks | Fines passed through by the acquiring bank, loss of the ability to process cards |
| SOC 2, ISO 27001 | No, voluntary | Lost deals and failed customer security reviews |

For a B2B software company, the voluntary frameworks often bite first. A startup selling to enterprises will meet a SOC 2 requirement in procurement long before it meets a regulator, and the consequence of not having one is measured in deals rather than fines.

## Operational consequences that are easy to miss

Beyond the four headline consequences, non-compliance creates ongoing costs. Regulators commonly impose corrective action plans that last years and require outside monitoring. Breach notification carries its own costs: legal counsel, forensic investigation, notification letters, and credit monitoring for affected individuals. Insurers raise premiums or decline cyber coverage for companies with known control gaps.

The pattern across regimes is that the fine is rarely the largest cost. The larger costs are the remediation performed under a regulator's supervision and the revenue lost while it happens. For the HIPAA case specifically, see [whether you can go to jail for violating HIPAA](/resources/answers/can-you-go-to-jail-for-violating-hipaa).
